🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This action is a direct response from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to reports in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to decide later this week regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial stability.

Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in EU countries following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened reciprocal measures, including confiscating EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant holdings can be located," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. They are also designing protections to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be required to repay the money in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense damage inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that when you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."